Posted at: Ben Witherington | Syndicated: December 31st, 2006 @ 9:20 pm
It was 1974 and I was graduating from Carolina and Mike Ford was graduating from Wake Forrest. We had talked about being roomates at Gordon-Conwell where we had both enrolled to go to seminary. He sent me a note in the summer saying it wasn't going to work out. Gordon-Conwell was the seminary that Billy Graham, a Charlottean had recommended, and his associate, my Charlotte neighbor Laden Ford, Billy's associate minister (no relation to the President) was my friend and encouraged me to go.
1974 was an interesting year. All of a sudden Gerald Ford became President, the only non-elected President we have ever had. Richard Nixon had resigned in disgrace. I was once given a tour of the White House in 2003 and had a long chat with one of the pages or stewards there who had been there since the time of President Johnson. He had a huge booming voice and was a huge African American man. I asked him what were the hardest days he ever had in the White House. He said it was the day that Nixon resigned and flew off from the White House lawn. He said everyone wept and felt lost.
But the President had lied to us about Watergate, and then had to resign lest he be given his walking papers by Congress. And then a real Christian gentleman had his brief time of fame. It was Gerald Ford, and his son Mike was going off to seminary. No one had expected him to become President. And it changed not only his life, but mine as well, because suddenly Mike Ford was not going to be my roomate. In fact he was going to be followed around by Secret Servicemen all the time during his seminary education. He had decided to go ahead and marry his girl friend Gail, but what a life they were to have-- newly weds sleeping in a tiny apartment at GCTS with two hulking body guards sleeping in the next room and watching their every move. It could not be an easy way to begin a marriage. I was one of the librarians at the seminary library and I remember the day one of the secret service men came to the desk and forlornly asked me "Don't you have anything in this library but religious magazines and books? Not even Sports Illustrated?" I suddenly felt sorry for them, trapped at a seminary doing a thankless job.
And then Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon. We all knew what that meant-- a pardon meant he had done something terribly wrong, like other pardoned criminals. Only Nixon was pardoned in advance of any trial. Gerald Ford was convinced it was the right thing to do, even though he took enormous heat for it. He thought it was the Christian thing to do. I remember hearing Mike talk about how hard that was. To pardon and forgive Nixon was not the hard part, and his Dad was sure it was the best way to help the country get beyond 'our long national nightmare'. He was right, but that did not make it easy. And then he had to do something else hard as well-- get the troops out of Vietnam. He believed that was the right decision as well, prayed hard about it-- and again he was right. It won him no prizes. In fact it probably lost him the election in 1976. You see, Gerald Ford was a kind, gentle, quiet, unassuming Christian man from Michigan. And he got hammered for acting on his convictions in both of those cases. It didn't matter he was going to do it anyway.
I remember the day Mike and I graduated in may 1977. President Ford had not been re-elected, but instead of simply going into retirement, he kept a promise he made to his son and others that when his son Mike graduated he would come give the graduation address to us at Gordon- Conwell. And so he did with two hilarious looking secret service men sitting with him in robes on the platform while he told us about what faith it took to be President, and especially to get through the hard times of his wife Betty's cancer which had led many of us to pray and pray. It was the only time I have met a President in person when I walked across the stage that day, and it was the last day I saw Mike Ford until this past week while watching the television presentation of President Ford's funeral. He has been a minister all these years like me, only serving different flocks. His blond hair had gone somewhat grey and thinned out, but he looked good. But he also looked sad and tired-- he loved his father a lot. During all those years of secret service men bird dogging him I never once heard Mike complain. He was like his Dad in that respect.
History will not like conclude that Gerald Ford was our best President ever, after all he served barely two years. But they were two crucial years and he made two crucial decisions-- the right decisions. I do often wish we had some real Christian statesmen like him to pick from in the next election. But ours is a different era where the political parties are much more polarized, and most of the interesting candidates running from either party, at least thus far, have very little experience in Washington, and even those who claim to be Christians, it doesn't much seem to affect their politics and behavior, only their rhetoric.
And so on this night I send out my best thoughts and prayers to Mike and his family, including his Mom. Gerald Ford deserved a better press, and a better historical assessment than he has thus far gotten. He was the very antithesis of Tricky Dick, who schemed and lied and got caught.
Shakespeare once said "some are born to greatness, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them." Gerald Ford was the latter sort of person, and the true measure of the man was shown when he was equal to the tasks and carried them out with dignity, honesty, and Christian character. May his tribe increase before 2008.
Posted at: Streak's Blog | Syndicated: December 31st, 2006 @ 6:29 pm
Posted at: conjectural navel gazing; jesus in lint form | Syndicated: December 31st, 2006 @ 5:38 pm
Okay. I made it through the service. I was told that I evenually turned as pale as the white robe I wore. Yay. I did break into a cold sweat somewhere during the communion service. Yeah. So, I came home...
Posted at: Rev. Gil | Syndicated: December 31st, 2006 @ 2:33 pm
Earlier this month, I finished what has been my toughest semester in divinity school so far. Someone should have warned me not to take Greek and Systematic Theology at the same time. but, everything turned out ok, and I have had some time to reflect on what has happened not only in the past semester but in the past year.
As I began my internship at FBC Statesville, there were those around me who encouraged me to investigate a career in the academic world. When you are on the kind of spiritual journey I am on, you tend to look for signposts: messages from God that give you an idea of which roads to take and which roads to pass by. So, a part of me began to wonder if these people were signposts from God pointing me in the direction of the academic world. In order to get a Ph.D., I would need to study German and French in addition to the Hebrew I had already studied and the Greek I was enrolled in. So, I decided I would think and pray about what my future would be this semester and try to make a decision by the end of the semester. To make a long story short, I feel like God has reaffirmed my call to work in the church during this past semester. I found myself enjoying ministry classes, like Pastoral Care and Art of Ministry, much more than the more academic classes like Theology and Greek.
Those of you who know me a little better, know that it has been a tough year. My home church in Tampa split, and the church I have been interning in has been struggling. But during my visit to
Logos Dei, a new church start here in Tampa, the words from Isaiah 43 kept going through my head:
18Do not remember the former things, or consider the things of old.
19I am about to do a new thing; now it springs forth, do you not perceive it?
While this scripture definitely applies to the life of this new church, I also felt that God was applying this to me. Its time for me to put the events of the last year behind me and its time for me to look for the new things that God is doing. I think this not only applies to my specific situation, but to the situation of the church in general. I think in many churches, the current model is not working; and the time has arrived for something new. What is that something new? I don't know yet, but I have some ideas. This transition to a "new church" is not going to be something we can accomplish on our own. Rather, it will be something my wife calls a "God sized thing"; something so big that we cannot possibly accomplish it on our own.
We need pastors who are willing to set aside their own ideas and, as Henry Blackaby puts it it in
Experiencing God, find where God is working and join him in this work. The church is not a business where the pastor is the CEO. We need pastors who recognize that being a senior pastor is not a higher calling than being a youth minister, a music minister, or a children's minister, and as a result, use team models of church organization rather than a hierarchical one. We need congregational leaders who understand that it is not "their church"; it is God's church. Finally, we need clergy and lay leadership who are willing to step out on faith; without faith, God sized things can't happen. This transition to a "new church" is not going to be something we can accomplish on our own. Rather, it will be something my wife calls a "God sized thing"; something so big that we cannot possibly accomplish it on our own.
I believe we have arrived at a pivotal moment in the life of the church. It is a time that is both scary and exciting. It is a time in which the church will need the gifts of all of its leaders, not just pastors. It is a time for everyone to understand that the church of the 21st century may look much different from the church we have come to know.
Posted at: Ben Witherington | Syndicated: December 31st, 2006 @ 1:20 pm
Posted at: Thoughts of a minister | Syndicated: December 31st, 2006 @ 12:31 pm
Posted at: Talk With the Preacher | Syndicated: December 31st, 2006 @ 11:50 am
Posted at: Streak's Blog | Syndicated: December 31st, 2006 @ 6:37 am
Posted at: Streak's Blog | Syndicated: December 31st, 2006 @ 5:13 am
Posted at: Tike's Best Friend | Syndicated: December 31st, 2006 @ 4:22 am
Posted at: conjectural navel gazing; jesus in lint form | Syndicated: December 30th, 2006 @ 9:25 pm
Sermon: Jesus Stayed Behind The First Sunday of Christmas, 2006 Community Church of Wilmette Colossians 3:12-17 Luke 2:41-52 O God, by the leading of a star you manifested your only Son to the peoples of the earth: Lead us, who...
Posted at: Big Daddy Weave | Syndicated: December 30th, 2006 @ 5:51 pm
Posted at: Barnabas File | Syndicated: December 30th, 2006 @ 11:59 am
Posted at: Blanket in the Grove | Syndicated: December 30th, 2006 @ 9:18 am
Posted at: Mainstream Baptist | Syndicated: December 30th, 2006 @ 8:53 am
The most widely linked and viewed blog post for the year 2006 was the July 15th post on "
What is Progressive Faith?" that recorded comments I made to the Progressive Faith Blog Conference in Montclaire, New Jersey. Here is a reprise of that blog:
What is Progressive Faith?
I think progressive faith to has at least ten characteristics. It is conscientious, chastened, hopeful, strong, humble, growing, questioning, dialogical, active and interdependent.
1. First, and foremost, a progressive faith is a conscientious faith.
I understand conscience to be an exercise of human understanding or imagination that involves three steps.
The first step is an act of intellectual (mental) distantiation that produces self-consciousness -- it is the ability to step outside yourself (whatever "self" is) and look back at yourself (as though you were looking at yourself in a mirror).
The second step is an act of sympathetic imagination by which you look at the world from the perspective of another.
We often hear this described by the phrase, "Walk a mile in my shoes." My good friend Foy Valentine, now deceased, once told me jokingly that doing this had proven highly profitable for him. He said that, whenever he did it he got a new pair of shoes and was a mile away before the poor guy he took them from knew what was happening. That's one of the reasons why I think conscience formation requires a third step.
It requires an act of reflexive self-consciousness. In simplest terms, this is the ability to put yourself in the place of others and to look at yourself through the eyes of others.
Essentially, this defines progressive faith as a faith that practices the Golden Rule.
Jesus of Nazareth gave the rule a positive formulation when he said "Do to others as you would have them do to you," (Luke 6:31 (NIV)) but the Golden Rule is not unique to Christianity.
Judaism teaches, "What is hateful to you, do not to your fellow man." (Hillel, Shabbath 31a.)
Islam teaches, "No one of you is a believer until he desires for his brother that which he desires for himself." (Hidith)
Even Buddhists, some whom deny the existence of any God, teach, "Hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful." (Udana-Varga)
Some formulation of the Golden Rule or some principle of respect for other persons seems common to all religions and philosophies.
2. Second, a progressive faith is a chastened faith.
It is a faith that sorrowfully acknowledges the pain, suffering and injustice that its own community has inflicted on others.
Chastening occurs when persons of faith look at themselves and their faith through the eyes of people of different faiths.
Christians need to look at themselves through the eyes of Jews -- particularly, through the eyes of those who were herded into boxcars and slaughtered like cattle in the holocaust.
Jews need to look at themselves through the eyes of Muslims -- particularly, through the eyes of those who were displaced from their homes in Palestine.
Muslims need to look at themselves through the eyes of Bahai's.
We all need to look at ourselves through the eyes of the hungry and the homeless, the impoverished and the imprisoned.
All of us need to summon the courage to honestly look at ourselves through the eyes of others who are strange and foreign to us and/or who have been injured and ignored by us.
If we do that, I believe that we will begin to view things the way that God views them.
3. Third, a progressive faith is a hopeful faith.
It is a faith that exercises a sympathetic and creative imagination to transcend the past and present realities of self, family, community, and nation to envision a world with a more benevolent, loving and hopeful future.
Guilt, shame and sorrow all summon us to search for forgiveness, reconciliation, restoration, regeneration, renewal, recreation, transformation, a new birth, -- i.e., some better way of living.
If life is just an endless cycle of violence, conflict and strife, then there is not much reason for a hopeful future.
4. Fourth, a progressive faith is a strong faith.
It is a faith that is strong enough to demand both equal rights in civil life and genuine respect in social life for those who have other convictions and different worldviews -- while remaining firmly committed to its own convictions and worldview.
Fundamentalist faiths can achieve power, but they can never be strong. All fundamentalisms are weak faiths that compensate for their inadequacies by scapegoating those who differ from them.
Fundamentalists fear differences and social change and the "other." They react to their fears by fight or by flight. Whenever they fight, they demonize and destroy whatever makes them afraid and insecure.
Faith can never become strong until it overcomes its fears and insecurities and begins to respect the integrity of conscientious difference.
5. Fifth, a progressive faith is a humble faith.
It is a faith that acknowledges the finitude and fallibility of all humanity. It recognizes that all forms of interpersonal communication and understanding fall short of perfect comprehensibility.
Different faiths privilege different expressions of faith as conveyed by different texts, practices, and rituals. Some make absolute claims for the authority of their competing texts, practices, and rituals.
Generally, it is not necessary to directly challenge the authority of these differing truth claims. It should be enough for all to acknowledge that no matter how sacred, perfect and privileged these texts, practices and rituals are believed to be, all historical faiths are subject to differing interpretations and understandings by adherents within their own faith tradition. Humility, therefore, is proper for people of all faiths.
No system of communication is adequate to fully express the meaning of the Divine. No language is perfectly transparent.
While some interpreters of religious traditions may be considered authoritative, infallibility is an attribute that is best reserved for the Divine.
6. Sixth, a progressive faith is a growing faith.
It is a faith that is growing, expanding, striving for depth and never satisfied with its progress. It is a faith that is incomplete, unfinished, and has never arrived.
Progressive faith does not lay claim to human perfectibility in this life.
7. Seventh, a progressive is a questioning faith.
It is a faith that is undaunted by critical thought. It is not a blind faith that expects adherents to surrender their intellect.
Instead, it practices what Paul Ricouer calls the "hermeneutics of suspicion" because it desires to be more than a projection of human wishes and desires, more than an opiate for the masses, and more than merely a slave revolt by which the weak seek to gain power over the strong.
Progressive faith welcomes doubt and raises questions because it knows they are necessary for the extension of understanding, for spurts of growth and for the testing and strengthening of genuine faith.
8. Eighth, a progressive faith is a dialogical faith.
It extends itself both by random acts of kindness and by deliberate acts of compassion and mercy.
It refuses to extend itself by force of law or arms.
Whenever it seeks to convert others, it seeks to do so by persuasion and example shared in moments of genuine dialogue.
9. Ninth, a progressive faith is an active faith.
It gives more than lip service to love.
It puts love in action by waging peace and working for justice.
It is faith with the courage to put itself at risk by publicly opposing injustice and by actively resisting it by non-violent means.
10. Finally, a progressive faith is an interdependent faith.
It recognizes both the value and the interdependence of all life on this planet.
It is a faith that affirms and honors the claim that future generations have on the present by responsibly stewarding the resources that make life possible on this planet.
Posted at: conjectural navel gazing; jesus in lint form | Syndicated: December 30th, 2006 @ 8:37 am
Justin did it first. Find your own pose! I am still stumbling along. Strep blows. I will me making no appearances at any Christmas/New Year parties this weekend. Today I will write something like a sermon...and that article...right....
Posted at: Streak's Blog | Syndicated: December 30th, 2006 @ 7:40 am
Posted at: TheoBilly | Syndicated: December 30th, 2006 @ 5:06 am
Posted at: Thoughts of a minister | Syndicated: December 30th, 2006 @ 4:58 am
Posted at: Melissa Rogers | Syndicated: December 29th, 2006 @ 11:43 pm
I wish you a wonderful new year. I'll be back on Tuesday, January 2....